Ignorance is not always blissBy GEOFF DAVIDIAN
Putnam Pit editor
One
really unfortunate thing about people who succeed without being very intelligent
is that smarter people use them by treating them as their equal then cast
them aside like an old pizza box out back a drug task force hideout.
Look
at the way City Attorney T. Michael O’Mara used District Attorney General
Bill Gibson to testify in Putnam Pit v. City of Cookeville -- a case about
which Gibson had no information whatsoever. (You
spoke but you didn’t know anything.)
No
one can accuse O’Mara of not being an advocate. The problem is, when personal
animosity drives a person, the advocacy stops being primarily for the client
and instead looks to what damage can be done to one’s adversary in the
name of the client and at the client's expense. (You
were used) O’Mara
ran for public office against Gibson but was defeated. If O’Mara were a
vain, petty, pompous or vindictive man who thought his part time job made
him special, he might want to hurt Gibson by letting the district attorney
general sully his own reputation and face professional discipline by testifying
against a newspaper that criticizes himself and O’Mara. (He
may have used your wish to cover your butt to put you at risk of punishment
by other lawyers) But
being smart while wanting vengeance at the same time has its shortcomings,
too. (Sometimes
being too smart is stupid.)
Once
it becomes evident that the smart but vindictive person is out to injure
another while pretending to serve the public interest, outside forces come
into play to counter any abuses. (Other
people are watching this.)
The
individual actions, the bills for services, the paper trail, the witnesses,
the testimony –- everything -- becomes evidence. (There
is proof.)
District
Attorney General Bill Gibson (you)were
set up because your desire to cover your incompetence made you fall for
City of Cookeville’s ploy to let you self-destruct while advancing their
cause. (You
were set up.)
But
O’Mara got paid, while you may take the fall. (You
are at risk now.) What you did is on record
– your defense of Lewis Coomer, your misstatements about the Eldridge murder;
what you may understand when this is over is that ignorant people in offices
of trust are wielded by smarter people for their own purposes, and when
an ignorant person wants only to retain the influence of office without
caring about principle – or understanding the concept – the hammer comes
down. (He gottcha for beating him,
he got paid a legal fee, and you face scrutiny that will not be defended
by the attorney general.) |